Glorious Noise - Rock and roll can change your life.
Est. 2001
Rock and roll can change your life.

You think I give a damn about a Grammy?

February 23, 2001

So it appears that I have missed the Grammys again. Not to get all Woody Allen or anything, but I'm going on a pretty long streak here. Like, I think the last time I tuned in, George Michael was getting something—and it wasn't just a sloppy kiss backstage from the Pinball Wizard. No, I think it was one of those little Victrolas (talk about a perfect representation of the relevance of the awards) for his seminal work with Wham!, but then again, I might be wrong.

Doesn't matter really. (Though I know someone out there's going to be shaking their fist, railing about how the Wham! Rap never got the propers it deserved.) Sex-is-fun George could have even been a presenter that last time I watched, but I don't care and you really shouldn't either. What are the Grammys, other than a bad TV show and a useless collection of mediocre music? Why watch, when you could be listening to something good? Or doing the goddamn laundry.

But no, we live in a society where we have to give out "awards." Where we are so damn worried that we won't receive the "recognition" for our hard work that most of our "hard work" is directed at things like awards and tributes and garnering praise from others. Internal motivation? Screw it, why do anything just to do it, just because you can? There's no point if there's no payoff, right? It's this attitude that's a cancer on our society, and it's this attitude that's responsible for the never-ending parade of musical clowns that occupy the limelight of our public consciousness.

And I don't care if the Monkees were a good band (they were), because they're still guilty of putting the PR ahead of the music. Not everyone is that lucky. (N Synch comes to mind, but maybe I'm just in a pissy mood today.)

Remember Milli Vanilli? Those poor suckers lost their Grammy in a wretched attempt to pretend that there was some sort of integrity to the awards. But why? Take their Grammy away, but let the other similarly talentless who win keep theirs? All because these guys didn't actually sing? Who cares! It's not about the singing, it's all about the award itself. Gettin' it in the first place, that's the objective. Playing the music is secondary, it's just a consequence of the desire to get that little record player statue. These guys did it just the way our society says to do it—worry about the accolades, get them in place, then work on your game. And they were punished?

Rather than being the Grammys' eternal patsies, they ought to recognize the Vanillis as the true patron saints of the Recording Academy. Hell, how about renaming the award after the late Rob Pilatus, getting rid of the little Victrola and replacing it with a nice two-turntables-and-a-microphone setup?

Girl, you know it's true.

Advertisement

Comments

Post a comment

(This is never shown.)



Advertisement

On This Day

Recent Comments

• sab on Taking it further: Furthur in Chicago: Finally had a chance to listen to most of the show, and I've got to say, this is awesome. Even...
• scotty on Alex Chilton, Dead at 59: Fuck! this fucking sucks.
• Wayne Curr on John Mayer Playboy Interview Excerpts: you know half the things he was talking about you probably did the same thing I wish!
• carefreediva on John Mayer Playboy Interview Excerpts: Ha I totally love every word he said though some others may think he probably shouldn't have said since he's...
• Mansward Delbin on Girls - Album: Todd, At the end of the year, every year, I go to Large Hearted Boy and listen to about as many...
Show more comments...

Related Posts with Thumbnails