Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:57 am
by Sugarcubes Forever
...you had me till "Arcade Fire."

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:52 am
by LionIndex
Well, I wasn't name-dropping them without reason. Maybe I'm remembering wrong, but they did actually write a rebuttal to SFJ's anti-indie article, where they listed all their African-American influences. I think they might have been a named target of the original article.

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:56 am
by LionIndex
Just googled it (you can DIY if so inclined), and SFJ's article about the Arcade Fire came out almost exactly two years ago. Maybe late October is sweeps week for music critics or something.

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:42 am
by creepy
Well, to be fair, The Arcade Fire are Canadian, therefore terribly white.

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:50 am
by Jake
LionIndex wrote:Just googled it (you can DIY if so inclined), and SFJ's article about the Arcade Fire came out almost exactly two years ago. Maybe late October is sweeps week for music critics or something.

Sho nuff. And, like a good lapdog, GLONO covered it back then too:

- Why is indie rock so fucking white?

- Arcade Fire Respond to Sasha Frere-Jones

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:13 pm
by Sugarcubes Forever
Jake wrote:Sho nuff. And, like a good lapdog, GLONO covered it back then too:

- Why is indie rock so fucking white?

- Arcade Fire Respond to Sasha Frere-Jones


Funny how for decades the white kids got criticized for rippin' off black culture and music. How many riffs and tunes did Keith Richards steal from various blues men, anyway? Schiat! there'd be no Elvis OR Rolling Stones had there been no such theft.

It's come full circle now, with the Grey Lady (the whitest of white publications, from Manhatten no less) doggin' some Canadians for NOT ripping off the black man.

That's racist!