SMiLE!

This is the place where you can vent whatever's on your mind. Feel free to go off on extended rants or brief blurbs about whatever's rocking your world.

Moderators: D. Phillips, Jake

D. Phillips
GLONO Team Member
Posts: 2892
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2001 8:00 pm

Postby D. Phillips » Mon Oct 04, 2004 6:26 pm

Well, I am a big fan of some of the Beach Boys' work. I love Pet Sounds and Surf's Up best and the original boots of SMiLE. Part of that was the rock element that the band maintained while singing these Teenage Symphonies. Mike Love may be a complete bastard, but that attitude came through in his vocals and kept the songs from going too far over that showtune cliff.

Is that element gone now and replaced by trained "vocalists?" I hope not.

booker
GLONO Board Mack Daddy
Posts: 477
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 3:01 pm
Location: Chicago

Postby booker » Mon Oct 04, 2004 6:51 pm

It's definitely a rock album, but still has that "showtunes" vibe you noticed. But that's nothing new in rock music. The Beatles did it all the time.

Jake
GLONO Team Member
Posts: 7239
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Michigan

Postby Jake » Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:57 pm

Christgau:

...though I considered the legend of Smile hot air back then, this re-creation proves he had plenty more to make of it. The five titles played for minimalist whimsy on Smiley Smile mean even more orchestrated, and the newly released fragments are as strong as the whole songs they tie together. Smile's post-adolescent utopia isn't disfigured by Brian's thickened, soured 62-year-old voice. It's ennobled—the material limitations of its sunny artifice and pretentious tomfoolery acknowledged and joyfully engaged. This can only be tonic for Americans long since browbeaten into lowering their expectations by the rich men who are stealing their money.

booker
GLONO Board Mack Daddy
Posts: 477
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 3:01 pm
Location: Chicago

Postby booker » Tue Oct 05, 2004 6:28 pm

Jake wrote:Christgau:

...though I considered the legend of Smile hot air back then, this re-creation proves he had plenty more to make of it. The five titles played for minimalist whimsy on Smiley Smile mean even more orchestrated, and the newly released fragments are as strong as the whole songs they tie together. Smile's post-adolescent utopia isn't disfigured by Brian's thickened, soured 62-year-old voice. It's ennobled—the material limitations of its sunny artifice and pretentious tomfoolery acknowledged and joyfully engaged. This can only be tonic for Americans long since browbeaten into lowering their expectations by the rich men who are stealing their money.


Christgau's a genius. Couldn't be said better.

Barabajagal
GLONO Board Maniac
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 11:15 am
Location: Not quite close enough to say Chicago

Postby Barabajagal » Thu Oct 07, 2004 11:32 am

I have to say, I listened again last night on some big speakers with some beers and really enjoyed it.

Then again I'm a sucker for anything that has harpsichord in it.

Batchy
GLONO Board Mack Daddy
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 11:32 am
Location: Dublin, Repbulic of Ireland

Postby Batchy » Thu Oct 07, 2004 11:33 am

Barabajagal wrote:
Then again I'm a sucker for anything that has harpsichord in it.


Like "Peach, Plum Pear" from Joanna Newsom. Did i say i was in love with her?

Barabajagal
GLONO Board Maniac
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 11:15 am
Location: Not quite close enough to say Chicago

Postby Barabajagal » Thu Oct 07, 2004 11:53 am

Batchy wrote:
Like "Peach, Plum Pear" from Joanna Newsom. Did i say i was in love with her?


You may just have done so. Thanks for the head's up!

harpsichord + rock = :-)

booker
GLONO Board Mack Daddy
Posts: 477
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 3:01 pm
Location: Chicago

Postby booker » Thu Oct 07, 2004 12:08 pm

Speaking of Joanna Newsom and her harp, isn't that "piano" song "Inflammatory Writ" kinda cool?

vitas
GLONO Board Kingpin
Posts: 605
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 8:00 pm
Location: chicago

Postby vitas » Thu Oct 07, 2004 12:37 pm

i just haven't been able to bring myself to pick this album up. is that wrong?

i really want to say that it's because the thought of reworking or re-interpreting past creative output is an abomination. though, i picked up the collection of "greatest palace music" by bonnie prince billy (aka will oldham) and absolutely love the stuff.

there's something about it that's causing me to shun it. should i?

why not just put out an official release of the original material?

trainwreck2
GLONO Board Maniac
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 12:55 pm
Location: not sweden like some losers here!

Postby trainwreck2 » Thu Oct 07, 2004 12:57 pm

isnt a lot of the original destroyed?


Return to “Rants and Raves”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests